Current:Home > NewsProposed TikTok ban for kids fails in Virginia’s Legislature -Dynamic Wealth Solutions
Proposed TikTok ban for kids fails in Virginia’s Legislature
View
Date:2025-04-27 21:51:52
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A GOP legislative effort to prevent Virginia children from using the popular video-sharing app TikTok — an idea backed by Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin — died this week in the Democratic-controlled Legislature.
The bill, sponsored by Republican Del. Jay Leftwich of Chesapeake, was left in a House of Delegates committee after concerns were raised about how the ban would be enforced. Lawmakers also questioned whether singling out just one company was the right approach at a time of broad and rising concern from parents and lawmakers about the effect of social media on youth.
The bill’s lack of movement effectively killed the measure because of a procedural deadline Tuesday for most legislation to clear its chamber of origin. No comparable bill was introduced in the state Senate.
Youngkin framed his call for a ban on kids using the app, issued in a December speech, as a tool to help protect children’s mental health, part of a broader push by his administration on the issue.
Leftwich also said he brought the bill out of mental health and data privacy concerns for young people.
“The whole platform, especially for minors, is to get them engaged and kind of hooked into watching these things. And it leads them down different rabbit holes and they sit there for hours and hours watching these things,” he said in a committee hearing.
Leftwich’s bill went through a hefty revision from the way it was first introduced. The most recent iteration said TikTok Inc. and ByteDance, the Chinese company that owns the app, “shall not provide access to TikTok to any child within the Commonwealth.”
The bill would have allowed a child’s parent or legal custodian to bring a lawsuit against TikTok if a child was provided access. And if a plaintiff prevailed, they could recover damages of $75,000 for “each discrete violation,” defined as each separate instance a child accessed the platform, along with other damages, according to the text of the bill.
The bill received one hearing in a House committee that deals with technology bills. It advanced from there on a bipartisan 14-8 vote to a different committee where it was never heard.
Democrats in the hearing raised a range of concerns, including questions about enforceability and whether the government — rather than parents — should be responsible for limiting children’s access to social media.
Leftwich responded that policymakers have banned children from having access to “harmful substances” like alcohol and cannabis, and that he saw his proposal in the same light.
Del. Holly Seibold, a Democrat from Fairfax County, thanked Leftwich for brining the bill, saying she was a parent of teenagers and agreed children are becoming addicted to social media apps and their cellphones in general.
“But I will not be supporting this bill because I think it’s unfair to single out TikTok,” she said.
A spokesperson for TikTok, Jamal Brown, said in a statement that the company works hard to support teens’ well-being on the app, with tools including an automatic 60-minute time limit for users under 18, restrictions on direct messaging and parental controls.
“We’ve long said bans, like the one proposed in this legislation, are not only the wrong approach, but also raise significant First Amendment concerns,” Brown said.
Macaulay Porter, deputy communications director for Youngkin, said in a statement that the governor “remains committed to empowering parents in Virginia and protecting youth in the Commonwealth from social media’s harmful impacts.”
Youngkin previously banned the use of TikTok on state government devices and wireless networks through a 2022 executive order, citing national security concerns.
Other states and the federal government have taken similar steps to limit the use of the app on government devices, and Montana in 2023 passed a complete ban, which was later put on hold before it could take effect by a federal judge who called it unconstitutional.
veryGood! (363)
Related
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- 'Grey's Anatomy' returns for 20th season. Premiere date, time and where to watch
- Portion of US adults identifying as LGBTQ has more than doubled in last 12 years
- TEA Business College team introduction and work content
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Remember the 2017 total solar eclipse? Here's why the 2024 event will be bigger and better.
- Ten years after serving together in Iraq these battle buddies reunited
- Emily Blunt Reveals What She Told Ryan Gosling on Plane After 2024 Oscars
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Virgin of Charity unites all Cubans — Catholics, Santeria followers, exiled and back on the island
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Nebraska governor approves regulations to allow gender-affirming care for minors
- Putin warns again that Russia is ready to use nuclear weapons if its sovereignty is threatened
- 2024 NFL free agency: Top 25 players still available
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- US and Japanese forces to resume Osprey flights in Japan following fatal crash
- Model Kelvi McCray Dead at 18 After Being Shot by Ex While on FaceTime With Friends
- Stop hackers cold: Tech tips to secure your phone's data and location
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Teen Mom's Cheyenne Floyd Says This Is the Secret to a Healthy Sex Life
TEA Business College’s Mission and Achievements
Brooklyn's 'Bling Bishop' convicted for stealing from parishioner, extortion attempt
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Five most underpaid men's college basketball coaches: Paris, Painter make list
2024 NFL free agency: Top 25 players still available
Dozens of big U.S. companies paid top executives more than they paid in federal taxes, report says