Current:Home > ContactNew state abortion numbers show increases in some surprising places -Dynamic Wealth Solutions
New state abortion numbers show increases in some surprising places
View
Date:2025-04-18 01:51:18
People seeking an abortion are "highly motivated" to travel if they can't get abortions where they live.
That's one conclusion from a study from the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy group that supports reproductive rights.
Here's one striking finding: in Illinois, there were 18,300 more abortions in the first half of this year compared to 2020.
"If you're interested in where people are going, then I think the numbers tell a big part of that story because it represents a lot of people traveling," says Isaac Maddow-Zimet, a data scientist at the Guttmacher Institute.
Illinois already provided a lot of abortions in the past, and the number increased by 69%.
"The percentage increase, I think, is also important because it does speak to the potential strain this puts on providers capacity to provide care," he says.
In New Mexico, there was a whopping 220% jump in the number of abortions.
Both New Mexico and Illinois have enacted laws to protect access to abortion. Their geography is another key factor.
"What we're seeing is really big increases in states that border ban states," Maddow-Zimet says.
There were also small increases in states bordering ban states that have not positioned themselves as havens for access, including in Montana and Wyoming, which border the Dakotas. Ohio, which has its own ban on hold, also saw a slight increase. It borders Kentucky and West Virginia, which have no abortion access.
States with abortion bans do allow an extremely small number of abortions, if they meet certain exceptions. This year in Texas, for instance, there have been four abortions on average each month — in 2020, that number was about 4,800 per month. (A lawsuit alleges that Texas's medical emergency exception is too narrow and prevents or delays care that's medically indicated.)
To estimate how the number of abortions has changed in each state, Guttmacher got data from a sample of providers every month and combined it with historical caseload data to create a model estimating abortion counts for January to June of this year. Then, for each state, researchers compared that estimate with the number of abortions provided in 2020, divided by two to represent a comparable six-month period.
One big caveat of this research is that it only measured abortions that happened in clinics, hospitals and doctor's offices, Maddow-Zimet says. "We do not attempt to measure counts of self-managed abortions, where somebody might be, for example, ordering pills from a pharmacy outside of the U.S., or obtaining them from a community network," he says.
He also notes that not all of the changes can be traced directly to last year's Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. "2020 was a long time ago and a lot has happened since then," he says. The COVID pandemic, and expanded telehealth, and a trend of increase in overall abortions that had already begun, all no doubt contributed to how state abortion numbers have changed to different degrees.
Guttmacher has put all of this data online, and they plan to keep updating it in nearly real time, Maddow-Zimet says. Soon they will publish data showing how new bans in Indiana and South Carolina, and a 12-week ban in North Carolina further change how people move around the country to access abortion.
Edited by Diane Webber; Graphics by Alyson Hurt
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- This AI expert has 90 days to find a job — or leave the U.S.
- Environmental Justice Leaders Look for a Focus on Disproportionately Impacted Communities of Color
- A woman is ordered to repay $2,000 after her employer used software to track her time
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- 4 ways around a debt ceiling crisis — and why they might not work
- Maui Has Begun the Process of Managed Retreat. It Wants Big Oil to Pay the Cost of Sea Level Rise.
- Forests of the Living Dead
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Inside Clean Energy: An Energy Snapshot in 5 Charts
Ranking
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- These Are the Black Beauty Founders Transforming the Industry
- Warming Trends: Bugs Get Counted, Meteorologists on Call and Boats That Gather Data in the Hurricane’s Eye
- Read Jennifer Garner's Rare Public Shout-Out to Ex Ben Affleck
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Jobs vs prices: the Fed's dueling mandates
- This drinks festival doesn't have alcohol. That's why hundreds of people came
- UN Report: Despite Falling Energy Demand, Governments Set on Increasing Fossil Fuel Production
Recommendation
John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
Coronavirus: When Meeting a National Emissions-Reduction Goal May Not Be a Good Thing
Southwest faces investigation over holiday travel disaster as it posts a $220M loss
Suspect arrested in Cleveland shooting that wounded 9
Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
Over 100 Nations at COP26 Pledge to Cut Global Methane Emissions by 30 Percent in Less Than a Decade
Why the Poor in Baltimore Face Such Crushing ‘Energy Burdens’
Inside Clean Energy: An Energy Snapshot in 5 Charts