Current:Home > StocksCalifornia lawmakers approve new tax for guns and ammunition to pay for school safety improvements -Dynamic Wealth Solutions
California lawmakers approve new tax for guns and ammunition to pay for school safety improvements
View
Date:2025-04-18 10:03:05
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers on Thursday voted to raise taxes on guns and ammunition and use the money to pay for gun violence prevention programs and security improvements at public schools.
The federal government already taxes the sale of guns and ammunition nationwide. The government gives that money to the states, which spend it on wildlife conservation and hunter safety programs.
California’s proposed tax, if it becomes law, would be 11% — matching the highest tax imposed by the federal government on guns.
Most states don’t have a special tax just for guns. Pennsylvania collects a $3 surcharge on gun sales and uses the money to pay for background checks. Fees in California total more than $37 on gun sales, with most of that money covering the cost of background checks.
The bill — authored by Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat from Encino — cleared the California Senate on Thursday. It has already passed the state Assembly, but Assembly members must vote on it one more time before sending it to Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk.
“Don’t let politics stand in the way of saving the lives of our children and providing mental health care in our school districts,” Democratic state Sen. Anthony Portantino said. “Fear should not be on the brow of a parent when they send their kids to school.”
It’s unclear if Newsom will sign it into law. Newsom has opposed some high-profile tax increase proposals in recent years. But he has also been on a crusade to improve gun safety, signing a law last year that lets private citizens enforce the state’s ban on assault weapons by filing civil lawsuits against anyone who distributes the weapons, parts that can be used to build the weapons, guns without serial numbers, or .50-caliber rifles.
California’s proposed tax would not apply to people who buy the guns. Instead, the state would make the businesses that sell guns and ammunition pay the tax. However, most of the time businesses will raise prices to cover the cost of the tax. The tax would not apply to police officers and it would not apply to businesses with sales of less than $5,000 over a three-month period.
“It’s a poll tax. It’s a tax on exercising a constitutional right,” said Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association, who opposes the tax. “We’re going to have to file a lawsuit to challenge it.”
The federal tax on guns and ammunition has been in place since 1918 and has survived multiple lawsuits. But things changed last year when the U.S. Supreme Court imposed a new standard for interpreting the nation’s gun laws. The new standard relies more on the historical tradition of gun regulation rather than public interests, including safety.
A legislative analysis of the California proposal said it is an “open question” whether a lawsuit challenging the tax would be successful.
The tax would take effect on July 1 and would generate about $159 million in revenue annually, according to an estimate from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. The first $75 million of that money would go to the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant Program. In 2020, the program funded projects targeting young people in gangs, including sports programs, life coaching and tattoo removal.
The next $50 million would go to the State Department of Education to enhance safety at public schools, including physical security improvements, safety assessments, after-school programs for at-risk students and mental and behavioral health services for students, teachers and other school employees.
___
Associated Press reporter Trân Nguyễn contributed to this report.
veryGood! (759)
Related
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Where to find Stanley Easter tumblers now that they've sold out
- Federal Reserve’s Powell: Regulatory proposal criticized by banks will be revised by end of year
- Watch as onboard parachute saves small plane from crashing into Washington suburb
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Senate passes bill to compensate Americans exposed to radiation by the government
- Offset talks solo tour that will honor 'greatest talent' Takeoff, his Atlanta 'soul'
- Houthi attack on ship off Yemen kills at least 3 people as Iran says it's seizing an oil shipment
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Fact Focus: Claims Biden administration is secretly flying migrants into the country are unfounded
Ranking
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Oprah Winfrey to Host Special About Ozempic and Weight-Loss Drugs
- What to know about abortion provider Dr. Caitlin Bernard, a guest at State of the Union
- Workers asked about pay. Then reprisals allegedly began, with a pig's head left at a workstation.
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, once allies, no longer see eye to eye. Here's why.
- Platform Mini Boots Are Your Perfect Shoe for In-Between Weather: From UGG to $27 Finds
- Iowa House OKs bill to criminalize death of an “unborn person” despite IVF concerns
Recommendation
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Pamela Anderson says this change since her Playboy days influenced makeup-free look
Judge denies Trump relief from $83.3 million defamation judgment
Putin’s crackdown casts a wide net, ensnaring the LGBTQ+ community, lawyers and many others
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
17-year-old boy dies after going missing during swimming drills in the Gulf of Mexico
Gunman in Maine's deadliest mass shooting, Robert Card, had significant evidence of brain injuries, analysis shows
New Jersey sees spike in incidents of bias in 2023